Somebody sends letter to me criticising the article titled "Harun Yahya and the last messenger " in this blog, I like to ask them some questions and I will write more after getting their reply:
Questions:
1. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that Mahdi would be a messenger after Prophet Muhammad(S)?
2. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that any type of messenger is predicted or possible to come after Prophet Muhammad(S)?
3. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that the messenger named Ahmad who predicted by Jesus to come after him (Quran 61/6) is a messenger who comes after Prophet Muhammad(S)?
4. The Quran 3/81 deals with a covenant of Allah which has been taken from prophets. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that this covenant has been taken from Muhammad too, and the messenger of covenant is a messenger who comes after Muhammad?
5. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that Muhammad is not the last messenger?
6. Can you show me a single reliable scholar who said that Mahdi will be a messenger who comes after Muhammad?
7. What is your opinion about the following hadeeth: (Prophet Muhammad said that) "The Messenger-ship and Prophet-hood has come to an end. There shall be neither Messenger nor Prophet after me." (Tirmidhi, Ahmad)?
8. Whence you have got the concept of 'every Muslim is a messenger'? Is it from the Quran and sunnah or from satan?
9. We enjoined to believe that لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله means there is no god but Allah; Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. Is it enough to pronounce that كل مسلم رسول الله means 'every Muslim is a messenger' instead of the second part of our kalimah? Or can you say both are equal?
10. What are the meanings of 'Nabi and Rasul' (in English)? Is there any difference between these two terms? What are the difference, if any?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
please do visit
http://psychologicalwarfaremethods.com/
June 9, 2009 5:19 AM
Luhar From The African Coast said...
Mr. KK can you please concisely state your argument. HY no where professes that a new Messenger-Prophet will come to proffess a new religion. The arabic language is multifaceted, he uses the term messenger like all muslims are messengers the mahdi will be a messenger. Is there any argument that all muslims are supposd to be messengers of the religion? Look the angel gabriel is called the ruh in the Quran and also Allah says that believers are re-inforced with the ruh. The Quranic language can mean multiple things in the context of the verses. There might be a hidden interpretation of the mahdi in the Quran. Since the Mahdi is the fundamental beliefs of all muslims it wouldnt be surprising that a verse can be interpreted in a manner that reflects the mahdi a.s as well as the prophet s.a.s. All his books focus on muhammad as the final messenger. IT seems you have never read much of his books. Rashad khalifa saying that Mahdi is messenger doesnt make him wrong, what makes him wrong is introducing things which all contradict Ahlus-Sunnah like no need for hadiths e.t.c. Same with Ahmadi's they deviated from Ahlus-Sunnah. One thing HY never claims he is mahdi a.s, no.2 no where does he say that the mahdi will bring a new law. 3. there is nothing wrong in interpreting any muslim for that matter as a messenger even in the Quran. When i read the Quran, where most translators say " Say (O Muhammad) when the Quran clearly says "Qul" only, i often take it that the Quran is telling me to say what follows the Qul. Now tell me is that wrong.?? you are focusing on small issues. When you find a major contradiction in HY works like him saying Mahdi will bring a new law or Mahdi a.s will receive revelation from Angel Gabriel e.t.c than you should blog. YOu are confusing people when clearly HY has clarified his position multiple times on the issue.
September 29, 2009 5:24 PM
Luhar From The African Coast said...
The point is that grouping and analysing HY with rashad khalifa and the ahmadis is a great injustice to this noble persons efforts when those two were clear misleaders, distorters and deviants from Ahlus-Sunnah creed. The Mahdi a.s will resemble prophets in character and morality but wont be a prophet. He will follow the creed of Ahlus-Sunnah and bear witness that Muhammad is the final messenger of Allah. That is the creed of Ahlus-Sunnah and that is the creed HY is propagating. To the verse even if i interpret the verse that Ahmad refers to the collective personality of Muslims it shouldnt be a big issue. Note he puts there Allah knows best. There will be nothing sinful, misleading, distortive to interpret that Jesus a.s foretold about Ahmad and that Ahmad refers not only to the prophet s.a.s but also to the collective personality of the Muslims. There would be nothing wrong in that or sinful or stepping out of the creed of the Ahlus-Sunnah.
Post a Comment